The modernity concept also dies in this century. Until then the Man who if characterized for the progress cultural technician and, it commits against this attempted against concept one when bombing Hiroshima, act of a clamorous and contrary irrationality to the any slight knowledge of global modernity. Antagonistically and consequently, century XX bequeaths us renascer of a terrestrial citizenship that the modern education must explore. It locks up the chapter discoursing on the identity and the terrena conscience, considering that the planetary union is the minimum rational requirement of a shrunk and interdependent world. Such union asks for to the conscience and a feeling of mutual belonging that joins in them to our Land, considered as first and last native land.

Such conscience of ours humanity in this planetary age would have to lead us it reciprocal solidarity, of individual for individual, all for all. The education of the future will have to teach the ethics of the planetary understanding. In chapter V the author guides to face the uncertainties or to remain itself in promptitude for the unexpected one therefore also in a lesson repetitively in century XX on the imprevisibilidade of the future was taught to them. This taking of conscience must be folloied by other, retroactive and correlative: of that history human being was and continues to be an unknown adventure. We live in one mondo uncertain in which the also uncertain adventure of the humanity does not make more than what to give continuation, in its sphere, to the uncertain adventure of cosmo. However, in way to such uncertainties, it is necessity that learn to face the uncertainties since we live at a time of changes where the values are ambivalent and where everything is on for the unifying planetarizao. It is therefore that, according to author, the education of the future must if to come back toward on uncertainties to the knowledge.

The East

The master then in gave the lesson to them: When an eye so firmly settled in the final objective is remained, surplus only one eye to find the way. Of that day in ahead, I perceived that you can focar yourself in the objective, but keep the other intent one in the way that you it will go to take. But why nobody explains this? Therefore the world occidental person is very different in its conceptions in relation to the east. Here it is all focus, conquest, money, income, success, and all the tools that function must be of short term, seno its ' ' discpulos' ' they finish for giving up the experience. Ahead of everything this, only uses that one formulates special: One day of each time, keeps the raised head, looks at for the horizon, but if it does not withhold in it, the future, the objective this soon there, it trusts, it looks in the retrovisor and it sees the things that you left you stop backwards, are as lies, but also if it does not withhold in them, after all already it passed, this it goes to make to direct to it more good, only it looks at for front, in the holes whom the road possesss, you has the ability to skirt each one, creating one personal technique of as to prevent them, this is to learn with the proper errors, God in gave to these three periods to them, past, gift future, each one as a purpose, of one forms integral exists one necessity to accept all, and uses them in weighed way, learning with what it passed, making better choices in now, and visualizing a future better. Chen master said that the great secret is the balance and zen recited me a poem, Haikai call, it he said that this to assist would go me in the agreement of much thing and that I meditasse in this: The focus simply foca the life is a horizon the perception is the focus of the horizon