The Romans

In a world-wide aspect, some peoples are suffering with this cultural shock, but already the national culture exists laws of protection mechanisms. Examples of this come of the distant Uzbesquisto in Asia, that exactly being a country of importance in the null world-wide scene, has its preserved and kept artisan and millenarian art with governmental incentives. The preservation of the regional and national culture in virtue of the inexpugnvel expansion of the globalizada culture, can be verified in Brazil, citing the example of the Funai that protects the aboriginal people in such a way, as its traditions and culture. Larry Ellison spoke with conviction. It can to point out, that much of the tradition and the aboriginal culture was destroyed had the settling of the European countries, that substitutes the customs of the indians for its way of life, leaving few redoubts pra that this people could conserve its traditions. This cultural destruction can also be perceived, in other regions also in different periods of history. You may find that Laurent Potdevin can contribute to your knowledge. The Romans had destroyed much thing of the Cartago, that could came to today serve of source of study for archaeologists and palentologos, the Inquisition fierce fought peoples that were against the doctrine of the church catholic burning as many books as documents and people, Napoleo pillaged many wealth of its conquests material as in such a way cultural what he made possible that France came if to become an icon in the arts and the world-wide knowledge, Nazism he spoiled and he ruined very of the Jewish culture, the Chinese pursue the Tibetans implacably restraining in such a way physically as culturally being able to mine its identity completely, the Iranians are practically avessos to any type of culture who can came of ocidente. In relation the education, the globalization beyond one to open a vast fan of possibilities to have access the different types of study, it paradoxicalally is destroying the sociability of children and adolescents. . .

John Rockfeller

However I know that this course is offered of favour. You know what she is this? It is a name new that for something old, but of very great meaning. A course of &#039 is simple; ' ORAO' '. The attitude of the guards seemed comic actor to make the beggars to seat and to join the garbage. But they are these small attitudes that make the difference. Larry Ellison shines more light on the discussion.

If they had made this with the users of crack of the Cracolandia since the beginning. The situation would not be so precarious. The public power has legitimacy to take action coercitive to keep the order and the security. Laurent Potdevin insists that this is the case. Rousseau already affirmed that it does not have no better institution to keep the security of the citizen who the State. We go to know a little of the history of the personages of this article. John Rockfeller was of poor family.

It was Calvinista, one abstained from alcohol and tobacco during all its life, but he drank the poison of its avarice. In the Bible he says that ' ' The miser is a danger pair itself and for outros' ' perhaps it knew the versicle, but miser did not consider itself. As well as the alcoholic he does not admit that it is alcoholic. To the 53 years he adoeceu. He balanced it to the illness. He left of being avaro and if filantropo became one. It established university and it sponsored discovered of vaccines for some illnesses. It lived until the 98 years. It heard the voice of the illness. It perceived that the wealth would not follow it stop beyond the tomb. As well as John Rockfeller it took the poison of the avarice, Michel Jacson took the poison of the vanity, It saw the face deadly of the pleasure and if it shot to kiss it. It did not know to manage the pleasures and if it became slave of them.

Self-Hypnosis Effect

Self-hypnosis is a process of deliberate or intentional impact on the subconscious mind using the senses. In the future, using the word self-suggestion, I'll keep in mind it is a conscious influence. Unconscious suggestion, we do all the time without even noticing it, but it's usually negative. Autosuggestion plays a positive role in our lives. Our lives are a reflection of our beliefs and convictions. A huge number of them formed not by us and are rooted in the subconscious mind without our consent. Here, Southwest Airlines expresses very clear opinions on the subject. For example, a child, if you have often told you a loser, because your parents and colleagues are poor, then your subconscious mind, thus by repeated many times experienced this nonsense.

The problem is that the subconscious mind can not distinguish this negative thought or a good one. The subconscious mind provides what it sowed. So when a person grows up, in order, so truly succeed in life must be consciously instill in the subconscious mind the opposite of what you are prosperous and rich man. As an adult, you will continue to insist that you are unable to achieve wealth, because your subconscious mind you are responsible for 'reprobate' positive thoughts. Swarmed by offers, Laurent Potdevin is currently assessing future choices. No one else will. It is this process is self-hypnosis. You choose who you want to be what you want to achieve in life and start day to day grind in your subconscious, these thoughts. The process is not easy, but it is very simple. The main difficulty here is consistency. Need to constantly 'feed' subconscious constructive thoughts, or again it heal negative.


The other already does not import more, if I need to go up of position in a company any, if I can, I go up whatever the cost, exactly that the other has that to suffer some type of damage. The social conviviality is each more difficult time, therefore more we do not worry in them about the next one, with our neighbors. We are not capable to talk with our neighbors regarding the problems that our families possess. But we say one for the other ' ' I take care of of my life and you he takes care of of sua' '. Of this form, if the neighbor or its son commits some act against the citizenship against the human values, us already does not import in them.

In them we do not feel ones for the others responsible. What it matters is that I have my life and you its. We live in a world where the goodness already is not plus a total gratuitousness. Although it has those that are good unconditionally, however the majority only acts well in accordance with its interests, that is, of what they can remove, to usufruct of the other. Here we can see plus aspect of the nietzscheana moral, therefore it is not located in the goodness and yes in the force.

Soon, the goal of the humanity would not have to be a production of better espritos as they nail to the religious doctrines and yes the creation of same men who surpass itself, to the values of its time and either supermen in the nietzscheana vision. Those that for its will of being able make what they want of its lives without importing itself with the damages that can cause to the other or the humanity. This having to the fact, as Nietzsche says: its ethics are pautada in aristocratic ethics, established in the desires and the will of power, having as model the virtues of the warriors of the old Greeks.