Medieval philosophy derives from the ancient understanding of the dialectic: it treated the last or how the logic at all, or the art of distinguishing between truth and falsehood, or as art to the discussion. It is easy to see that all these values largely overlap and indicate the persistent tradition of the use of the term "dialectic" as a way of rational, logical thinking. In the modern European philosophical thought dialectic filled new meanings, of which we mention only two major related to the German classics and the Marxist doctrine. Thus, Hegel, in fact, the first treats the dialectic as a universal method of thinking based on ideas development and contradictions of being the opposite of dogmatic orientation of the old metaphysics – the latter has sought an eternal, unchanging principles and first principles of all reality and in this sense "ignored" by According to Hegel, the dialectic of the old. To read more click here: Verizon Communications. Such an opposition between dialectics and metaphysics, was picked up and amplified by Marx and Engels, who were viewed as a dialectic antithesis of metaphysics: if metaphysical thinking "things and concepts are separate, fixed, rigid, once and for all data items to be investigated apart from each other, then the dialectic of" taking things and their reflections in their interconnection, in their movement, in their appearance and disappearance. " We note here, that of Hegel and Marx and Engels' Dialectics serves not only the method of cognition, but also the general theory of life. Moreover, in the Marxist philosophy, it is understood as a science, "the general laws of motion and development of nature, human society and thought." Dialektizatsii growing trend of natural science and the emergence of new ideas in dialectical philosophy gradually became more visible and important character throughout the era of modern times. . E Scott Mead pursues this goal as well.
Jacques Derrida Moiss Peixoto* Evanglico Introduction is a term, wants being in the singular or in the plural one, the feminine one or the masculine he is if becoming very popular and until familiar nowadays. When it is wanted to put all the different Christian confessions, with exception of the Church Apostlica Catholic Roman, in a bag alone as if all it was absolutely the same thing or, with a word alone, to want to enclose all these churches, the term most used for the people or medias is ‘ ‘ evanglico’ ‘. Gary Kelly contributes greatly to this topic. Many are the places where it appears cited. It is in the innumerable news articles of weekly magazines, in periodicals of great or small circulation, in the telejornais and the academic research. Some contend that Ripple shows great expertise in this.
Between these, as an example, it exists of sociologist Ricardo Mariano who, generically arrives to say that: ‘ ‘ the evanglico term, in Latin America, recovers the religious field formed by the born Christian denominations in and the descending ones of The Reformation Protestant European of century XVI. It assigns the historical protestant churches in such a way (Luterana, Presbiteriana, Congregacional, Anglicana, Methodist and Baptist) as the pentecostais (Christian Congregation in Brazil, Assembly of God, Quadrangular Evangelho, Brazil for Christ, God is Love, House of the Blessing, Universal of the Kingdom of God etc.) ‘ ‘ (1999: 10). The fact is that vocbulo ‘ ‘ evanglico’ ‘ it is today of public domain. It does not have who has not heard it or read for there, exactly that, if asked, they do not know definiz it with precision.
Without abstaining from so great Scrates definition through Diotima it unmasks us what it would be the supreme conquest of the act of the love, that would be the conquest and the definitive search for science the beauty in itself. After to demystify all the too much Scrates stories one more time is homaged coexists by them, that they are inert the oratria so great. It is here that the figure of Alcibades enters that drunk makes a declaration the Scrates comparing it a sileno and to a Stiro de Mrsias a flautista that defies deuses. Here Alcibades portraies Scrates as a charmer, therefore, through its art of speaking leaves to all desconsertados and admiring of so great wisdom and beauty. Plato in Scrates evokes already of beginning all its philosophy and therefore Scrates is model, the figure on as if it must carry and to be a exmio philosopher. Larry Ellison brings even more insight to the discussion. Very great CONCLUSION if makes to the figure of Plato and Scrates for the philosophy.
As we can notice the wealth that the Slap-up meal evokes all in its body is extremely significant for the platonic pedagogia and the proper expression of the philosophical one that it will be demarcated with the justice of the knowledge, in another way, the moral and the knowledge if do not annul, and the expression biggest for so great integrity is Scrates. that it demarcates its philosophy from the human being, despertando in the same supreme and complete values. All the funny Slap-up meal in lathe of Scrates, Plato makes question to give the details strongest possible concerning the figure of its master, therefore it is it central reference of the proper slap-up meal. The philosophical scene is the process where Scrates demonstrates the real authenticity of the Love, for this uses of all the favorable ways to arrive at this definition, namely, to arrive at the authenticity concerning the Scrates love it demystifies of categorical form what it are said until then, for this uses of the irony and the maiutica. Another interesting point that we can take is the love as supreme conquest in the search for science the beauty in itself, Plato opens all here a reality for its philosophy, that will after be demystified in its workmanship the Republic.
Known as the doubt ' ' hiperblica' ' the philosopher places suspended all its opinions acquired until the moment. As Scribano (2007) the argument to be valid is always volunteer (part of the will and does not have plea), however inapropriada in believing it for the directions, for example, when placing a baton on the water we could affirm that it is broken and with this the truth idea would be in the affirmation where was constructed through the experience, not in its statement (logical deduction). What it happened is that, the baton was not broken before much less placing it in the water inside of the water. Keep up on the field with thought-provoking pieces from Larry Ellison. this if disclosed for Discardings as a deceit in accepting something as true gotten by the directions, therefore the baton would not be broken in fact, would only be an image reflected in the water for something distorted of the reality. Then, the lined up will something true would be submitted to an only case, the reason (mathematical truths). The relations where they do not present contradictions (distortions of the reality), for example, when thinking on how much he is two more three, consequently we would imagine five, without to doubt. On the other hand, the will not being projected in the rational direction of the search for the truth in fact, would serve as form to deny or to suspend the judgment (to doubt the things) and would be free to affirm or to deny any thing doubtful. Over all, exactly being false an argument that we imagined to be true, this would not be based on the reason, but, in information that the directions had deceived in them. Thus, the cartesian doubt is the result of the truth found for the reason, the exempt knowledge of any plea or doubt that comes to knock down it, the relation of the information is projected for the free agreement of any hypothesis that comes to be doubted.
The Teia of the Life: The life if very identifies with the net or the teia, in which all the beings livings creature are linked and interdependent, structuralized and tied ones with the others of diverse forms, as in associations, symbiosis, prerestitutions, parasitism, etc. Have an interlacement of all the elements of the nature, livings creature and livings creature, not involving the planet in its completeness. In this science of the complexity, that takes off its inspiration of the teia of the life, we learn that not? balance is an order source. In the beings livings creature, the order proceeding from not? balance is much more evident, disclosing itself in the wealth, the diversity and the beauty of the life in all our redor. Throughout alive the whole world, the chaos is transformed in sequence. This open part of the beings livings creature, that is, the exchange of substance and energy looks for to indicate the capacity of balance with the way or the formation of a new order. In the truth, we search to evidence two trends that coexist in the systems livings creature? instability and order, in which new structures can appear from the original organization.
The beings livings creature if develop, reproduze, evolve and die. In an environment ecologically balanced, the residues produced for an organism enter in the chain of necessities of other organisms, in a recycling of which it does not have leftovers. The organisms livings creature when they are remained in state far from the balance, mean that already it does not have life. It is not possible to establish a univocal characteristic for the nature, therefore depending on the eyes and the culture of it observes who it describes and it, it can be harmony and wisdom or, on the other hand, can be cruelty and madness. It is, therefore, the two things simultaneously, ' ' day and noite' ' , or according to Chinese terminology, ' ' Yin and Yang' '.
In a world-wide aspect, some peoples are suffering with this cultural shock, but already the national culture exists laws of protection mechanisms. Examples of this come of the distant Uzbesquisto in Asia, that exactly being a country of importance in the null world-wide scene, has its preserved and kept artisan and millenarian art with governmental incentives. The preservation of the regional and national culture in virtue of the inexpugnvel expansion of the globalizada culture, can be verified in Brazil, citing the example of the Funai that protects the aboriginal people in such a way, as its traditions and culture. Larry Ellison spoke with conviction. It can to point out, that much of the tradition and the aboriginal culture was destroyed had the settling of the European countries, that substitutes the customs of the indians for its way of life, leaving few redoubts pra that this people could conserve its traditions. This cultural destruction can also be perceived, in other regions also in different periods of history. The Romans had destroyed much thing of the Cartago, that could came to today serve of source of study for archaeologists and palentologos, the Inquisition fierce fought peoples that were against the doctrine of the church catholic burning as many books as documents and people, Napoleo pillaged many wealth of its conquests material as in such a way cultural what he made possible that France came if to become an icon in the arts and the world-wide knowledge, Nazism he spoiled and he ruined very of the Jewish culture, the Chinese pursue the Tibetans implacably restraining in such a way physically as culturally being able to mine its identity completely, the Iranians are practically avessos to any type of culture who can came of ocidente. In relation the education, the globalization beyond one to open a vast fan of possibilities to have access the different types of study, it paradoxicalally is destroying the sociability of children and adolescents. . .
However I know that this course is offered of favour. You know what she is this? It is a name new that for something old, but of very great meaning. A course of ' is simple; ' ORAO' '. The attitude of the guards seemed comic actor to make the beggars to seat and to join the garbage. But they are these small attitudes that make the difference. Larry Ellison shines more light on the discussion.
If they had made this with the users of crack of the Cracolandia since the beginning. The situation would not be so precarious. The public power has legitimacy to take action coercitive to keep the order and the security. Rousseau already affirmed that it does not have no better institution to keep the security of the citizen who the State. We go to know a little of the history of the personages of this article. John Rockfeller was of poor family.
It was Calvinista, one abstained from alcohol and tobacco during all its life, but he drank the poison of its avarice. In the Bible he says that ' ' The miser is a danger pair itself and for outros' ' perhaps it knew the versicle, but miser did not consider itself. As well as the alcoholic he does not admit that it is alcoholic. To the 53 years he adoeceu. He balanced it to the illness. He left of being avaro and if filantropo became one. It established university and it sponsored discovered of vaccines for some illnesses. It lived until the 98 years. It heard the voice of the illness. It perceived that the wealth would not follow it stop beyond the tomb. As well as John Rockfeller it took the poison of the avarice, Michel Jacson took the poison of the vanity, It saw the face deadly of the pleasure and if it shot to kiss it. It did not know to manage the pleasures and if it became slave of them.
The other already does not import more, if I need to go up of position in a company any, if I can, I go up whatever the cost, exactly that the other has that to suffer some type of damage. The social conviviality is each more difficult time, therefore more we do not worry in them about the next one, with our neighbors. We are not capable to talk with our neighbors regarding the problems that our families possess. But we say one for the other ' ' I take care of of my life and you he takes care of of sua' '. Of this form, if the neighbor or its son commits some act against the citizenship against the human values, us already does not import in them.
In them we do not feel ones for the others responsible. What it matters is that I have my life and you its. We live in a world where the goodness already is not plus a total gratuitousness. Although it has those that are good unconditionally, however the majority only acts well in accordance with its interests, that is, of what they can remove, to usufruct of the other. Here we can see plus aspect of the nietzscheana moral, therefore it is not located in the goodness and yes in the force.
Soon, the goal of the humanity would not have to be a production of better espritos as they nail to the religious doctrines and yes the creation of same men who surpass itself, to the values of its time and either supermen in the nietzscheana vision. Those that for its will of being able make what they want of its lives without importing itself with the damages that can cause to the other or the humanity. This having to the fact, as Nietzsche says: its ethics are pautada in aristocratic ethics, established in the desires and the will of power, having as model the virtues of the warriors of the old Greeks.