The Federal Supreme Court

The experience in other open-ended real estate funds, also from the had the decision on the continuation of the legal maximum suspension period to meet, however, shows that this was not crowned by success. Compensation for SEB Immoinvest investors regardless of investors the possibility of obtaining damages due to incorrect advice, do not overlook any leave. The experiences of the last few weeks and months show that just lack awareness about refunds, so those commissions received the distributing banks and savings banks for the transfer of Fund investments, represents a good starting point for the successful enforcement of claims for damages. The Federal Supreme Court has noted here that banks and savings banks were obliged since 1990, to inform about such kickbacks. For cases where from summer 2008 to purchase of fondant rush at the SEB Immoinvest was advised, is to note that there were numerous reports in the business press, in addition the with the global real estate bubble burst and the Impact on the open real estate funds concerned. Numerous courts have reveal, that they see a duty of disclosure of the investment advisor regarding these reports and the market development is shown.

Was so this not elucidated, these courts see good opportunities for the investors claim damages. You have drawn the SEB Immoinvest shares and feel incorrectly advise? We like to enforce your claims for you. Call us at. Nittel Banking and capital market law firm contact Mathias Nittel, lawyer specializing in banking law and capital market law ‘ Alexander Meyer, lawyer Heidelberg: Hans-Bockler-Strasse 2 A, 69115 Heidelberg phone: 06221 915770 Fax: 06221 9157729 Munich: residential street 25, 80333 Munich Tel.: 089 25549850 Fax: 089 25549855