Quentin Dexter Diary

-Diary of a homeless – therefore it is a diary. No ordinary diary, but a video diary that he for years It leads and so probably also ran after the loss of the home. Bob Bakish understood the implications. Dreemos”, the name of his camera, was a relic of times of long loneliness, a silent witness and long also his only friend”, he admits. “” notes/max-bryan/farewell and diary/303290346355554 Facebook Max Bryan: others have pets, I had my camera “and Dreemos has seen it all and heard, what I saw and heard”. She was witness of everything what was and what is, according to the diary of the homeless Max Bryan. At David Rogier you will find additional information. -Log of a travel – if true, that would be a sensation almost. Pictures from the scene of the homeless are hard to obtain and the life of a homeless man, live and in real time, would be filmed an absolute novelty, also due to the duration of the observation. “Downright touching acts” as the comparison to Wilson, a volley from the US movie cast away “, whose hero played by Tom Hanks – Chuck Noland – for many years with a volleyball conversed, because he otherwise does anyone to the talk had.

These images could prove that the homeless Max Bryan had actually no choice, that he was trapped in his situation, and the camera was his only confidant. Currently, a Hamburg-based filmmaker sifts through the data complete arsenal of the homeless, who carried his laptop, in addition to hard drives and camera apparently in the backpack with him, while he slept at night outside. Also, it is unclear where the homeless had the camera and whether there is also a broadcast-capable sound. Considering the wealth of pseudo real documentary format in German television is likely to remain it so exciting to see whether the life of Max Bryan perhaps still in the picture and sound is experienced, and be it just for the sake of truthfulness. Sean Quentin Dexter for TeleNewsNet tvdesk/Soziales/Obdachloser-MaxBryan-Videotagebuch.html

The Western

So, we have the contrast between the one the is in contact with a higher power (to God) are looks and therefore know what is to do, and we have the people who must be only obedient. It was the only task of the people and who does not follow the instructions of the Faqih, the Supreme Leader, is arrested, tortured and is subject to the death penalty. I want to give an example, in short: If the Faqih, the Supreme Leader, wants to appoint a President, the people don’t like and don’t want and defends itself against the appointment of the President, then the people are disobedient not only the Faqih to, but also to God. We can ask ourselves so, what makes this system a sense or it serves any purpose. In the best case, a system of Government has intended to organize a society in fertile way.

Why has Khomeini of this velayat-e Faqih system created? According to Khomeini was the sole purpose of establishing this system from the outset to tear the whole world out of the hand of Satan. And who is Satan? The Western world. And the United States is the great Satan. Can this purpose from the very beginning consider it as a declaration of war. This system is similar to a despotic system, the Caliphates of Omajaden and Abbasids, and various other systems. How do we find a seed of democratic impulses in such a system? A democratic system is based on social contracts, voluntary, on the free will of the individual people. In this despotic system, everyone must be entirely obedient. To govern a society, it is very important to have a plan and an idea of how to organize a society economically. Maybe you remember that some people belonging to the Khomeini asked him, how it look with the economy, what they should do and should make his opinion.

Gordon Allport

Want to weigh yourself in the safety of the crowd. This need to belong to the average, is rooted in the human brain Homo sociologicus, they showed with brain scans, that completely different brain regions are active, depending on whether they become more like the opinion and the behavior of the majority or whether it occupies a single position distress. u0085 It is, we like to believe what we see. “In reality we see what us to believe our environment makes”, and what happened in the brain of subjects who confidently opposed the majority opinion? Their judgment created an activity in the Mandelkern, a region of the brain that is responsible for the processing of emotions and stress. The researchers conclude that independent thinking is more cognitive power, and that it therefore is more efficient for the brain, to adapt to the crowd. If it is not clear what is the correct behavior in a situation, the brain selects the Energiesparvariante EU-stress. Nomura helps readers to explore varied viewpoints.

u0085 “The social norms seem like a magnet on the behaviour of all those who are above the average, both the below.”… boomerang effect “. It is not foolish to be aligned with the majority, when one is uncertain… Because statistically speaking more like a group the right decision as an individual. It developed into something like a collective Schwarm- intelligence, where the size of the Group acts as a corrective.

Also, the person in the course of evolution has learned that a turncoat mentality is like a life insurance policy: he orders the rules to his Reference group, which ensures him the protection of the community. u0085 Also the recognition of others is an important action Motif -ation. You drives the people, to do what is valued in society. One hopes for recognition and want to before punishment praise + rebuke: pleasure + frustration protect. Source: image of wissenschaft.de social psychology is the branch of psychology which explores the effects of actual or featured present of others on the experience and behavior of the individual (Gordon Allport in 1968).

Judith Goller

Aside – I resent every now and again about these people, because I you look at so figuratively, that they perceive inside immediately turn off, Dodge as soon as they tell me – these are mischievous totally insecure and not open for strange in their lives. “I hear” the “In their minds strong click button”! And in the TV this set is said also every now and again, as I recently saw this on the example of Julia Probst (via their Twitter success at night Magazine at ARD). This is a typical attitude of hearing the voices of the deaf are not used to. It is not the only one to. Remember Natalie Girth, the deaf successful architect who implanted himself had some of you a film about? Her voice was completely spoken to that ideal sound in television – and the left kind of a rip-off. The experience with hearing impaired voices prevented parallel from nighttime people. I do not find that fair to you and us speaking deaf.

At the hearing, there is yes even people that don’t – talk the Nuschelnden – since I claim as well as hearing impaired: this listening can say no way. And of which I know really a lot – hearing people that mumbling, can not speak. Or even better: Normal sounding, which can barely open her mouth talking, can also not speak–from the perspective of the deaf. We have hard of hearing with our perceptions as well quite like normal sounding, who believe that hearing impaired can hardly speak. Their normal hearing can not imagine absolutely, how many speaking hearing impaired, we must make to make our way of speaking I understand friendly! Over and over again! Without their own “stop control”! Every day.

Given nothing, we have to learn it all. If the social structure are even no opportunity himself the hearing-impaired (typical -say, colorless and often not existing debate) agree to listen to how can you break down the barriers? Sounds good at the people inside, listen with open ears and accept the strangeness of the people! Since we are hearing impaired want to be understood, we also ask us to improve, if we mispronounce a word or stress. We show the listener, how they form a better picture of the lip while talking.

Elias Canetti

Jose Ortega y Gasset, who formulated in 1930 in the revolt of the masses: If the mass is independently, she do it only “in a way: you Lynch.” Elias Canetti, mass and power (1960), which recognizes the essence of the mass in a historically comprehensive trans-cultural study as belonging together with the phenomenon of power which he characterized in the structure of command and sting. As a kinescope leading principle, he determined the urge for self-preservation. Hermann Broch, mass delusion theory (1948, published posthumously in 1979), which noted a growing satisfaction and unique need of the masses, which meets in the pathological case of leader ideologies (which he can prove to the Nazis) seems to be. Which he is founder of opposite, whose objective eternity and humanity is there a single Entscheidungs-(formal-)Macht he mutates into the authoritarian behavior.. see my essays about power! Source: wikipedia.de, from wikipedia, author swarm thinking represents a third form of “collective” intelligence in addition to human intelligence and the potential intelligence of machines or computers. This increases the interaction of many individual processes (intuition: heart + brain, empathy, mirror) similar to ants, fish or bird swarms (instinct) the performance of the overall system.

The wisdom of crowds – why groups are smarter than individual… that that result in accumulation of information in groups to a common group decisions, which are often better than approaches of individual participants. Get more background information with materials from ViacomCBS. … that visitors to a livestock exhibition in a competition appreciated the carcass weight of bovine exactly if you took the average of all estimates as an estimate of the group. (The Group’s estimate was even better than that of each participant, including some butchers.) … Parallels with statistical selection procedure, a different group of individually decisive people can rather represent the totality of all possible outcomes of an event and therefore is able to make better predictions for the future.

YouTube

I want to keep even a long speech, but would rather answer your questions, and appear in a discussion about the Iran and Islam with you. HP contains valuable tech resources. After 32 years of the Iran Islamic revolution everyone Islam is talking about. But do we know what is meant by Islam? There are about 1.5 billion Muslims around the world. When we would ask them ‘What is Islam?’, they will assuredly give the answer that Islam is a religion. Williams Sonoma understood the implications. “All others who are not Muslims, would give the same answer: Islam is a religion.” “But when Ayatollah Khomeini took over the power of the Shah, 32 years ago, he said this sentence: no one knows what is Islam.” He does so for the first time the question what is Islam?”into doubt. His speech, in which he asks this to Islam, can be seen today on YouTube. “I quote from it: no one knows what is Islam and no scholar of Islam in this world has a clue.” So, this is a crucial question, because it comes to know a political ideology or theory that governs a country. In other words, when Khomeini said that nobody not even know – the Islamic scholar scientific, has what Islam means he himself developed a political theory, which he has called Islam.

This theory was not known until then. It was the theory or ideology of domination of the Jurists (velayat-e Faqih). According to velayat-e Faqih, Islam is not a religion. A Faqih is someone who has a doctorate in Islamic law and thus represents a high religious authority. In other words, it’s about velayat, which is the authority that has to speak the last word as regards legal matters, and to the dominance of this authority, the reign of the scribes. So we have the contrast between velayat, an Association of domination in a person who has the Supreme authority in all matters and all others, the so-called Safis, dudes and babes.

English Bill

Non-violence, tolerance and freedom of conscience are considered important humanist principles of human coexistence. But are the actual questions of humanism: what is man? What is his true nature? How can the man be a man the people?” Humanism is the totality of ideas from humanity and after that of striving to improve human existence. The term is derived from the Latin terms of humanus (human) and humanitas (humanity). Humanism is based on the following fundamental principles: the happiness and well-being of the individual and of society form the highest value, where every action to Orient. The dignity of the human person, his personality and his life must be respected. The man has the ability to form and develop.

The creative powers of the people to thrive. Human society to guarantee the dignity and freedom of the individual in a progressive evolutionary. Humanity is the practical implementation of the ideas of humanism. These include the goodness, kindness, and compassion for the weaknesses of people, itself held to be his powerful and are reflected in the people themselves. u0085 In the narrower sense, intellectual climate of the 15th and 16th century advanced, are providing the scholasticism of the middle ages is known as humanism. One differentiates between the Renaissance as a the comprehensive cultural and social change between the middle ages and modern times and the humanism as the education movement, which is based on him.

Later formulated the developed parts of the people: the English Bill of rights (1689), they overcame the prevailing until then thought of the school and replaced it with the principle of parliamentary sovereignty. Thus was initiated the way political enforcement of human rights. The Declaration of independence of the United States (1776). Declaration of human and civic rights (1789). > Subjective rights are referred to as human rights, which is equally available to everyone. The concept of human rights and duties assumes that all people solely on the basis of their humanness with equal rights provided and that these egalitarian reasonable rights are universal, inalienable and indivisible.

District Court

The police had a Finding deficit, here the freedom of expression on the track, which is freedom of expression remained part of the public safety. It is to balance between privacy and freedom of expression. Judge Dhom also criticized the lack of proportionality of police operations. The right of the applicant you can not deny through legal constructions, a swipe at the Verwaltungsgericht (VG), Munich. Judge Andreas Dohm continues: “we are of the opinion that has that ubersteigernde is chosen even satirical character, take the euphoria… (“We are Pope”- Germany in the folly of the Pope) on the arm and they get seen reality on which of them”, it is a characteristic of satire, that distorted things, oversubscribed, exaggerate, represents. There are none on the idea to think that the Pope recommends condoms.” A revision did not allow the (VGH). Holzapfel: “I have statements of the former Cardinal Ratzinger, prefect of the Congregation of the Catholic faith and the present Papst Benedikt used.” “One of the statements was:”Homosexual relations are deeply immoral”or homosexuals with compassion is to meet”, are unacceptable.

The headline “we are Pope”?, should express are also homosexuals part of society. With the appearance of condoms should be pointed out the condom ban of the Catholic Church, the Aidsschleife as a symbol of the consequences of the condom ban, especially in Africa. It was at the same time a concern to point out the double standard of the katholichen Church. A victory for freedom of expression, and as I my a very important judgment, which in recent times have been in Munich in the Bavarian countryside often by officials of the State security and the police, posters and applied art activities disrupted, so thought to forbid police officials on May 15, 2009 in Mittenwald an art action, 90 minutes after the photo session four police officers arrested the artist and a photographer at lunch and unlocked them for three hours in ice-cold hyrcana cells in the Keller, so artist Wolfram p. Kastner. Two of the detainees were forced to strip. The completely plated assault of the police state protection apparently by a zealous police oberhaupt Commissioner Sepp of the Commissariat “in Weilheim and the public prosecutor’s Office ordered. The arrest and the deprivation of liberty on May 15, 2009, by the police and the Weilheim “State protection” after an art action against the glorification of war criminals in Mittenwald were objectively unlawful”, as noted by the District Court of Munich now. Supposedly there is a misunderstanding”that given the significant consequences acted very regrettable” was. Now, the lawyer of the artist is a claim for damages against the unlawful trading StaatsSchutzer”submit.

French Revolution

Through the repetition of such actions, pressure should be made as to respect Member of UN human rights in their own country the regime in the Iran. At the same time, the message to the Iranians on the street is: we know in the West Know that we are available to you. Students from Europe support their fellow protesters in the Iran a German student who studied European law and economic cooperation in Maastrecht and visited the Parliament in Brussels with her fellow students, commented the action: so far we get with that in Europe, many of our peers behind the walls of the Iranian State security that are employed to fight for something, what we must savor here within certain limits: Freedom. “I will support this action and would like to call to the people in the Iran: continues singing, so that you can hopefully burst the walls and you take your development in your hand!” Hub of the pursued simultaneously on this day a press conference of the national of resistance Council in Brussels took place, which dealt with the same question: How can the regime in the Iran to be moved to respect human rights in their own country. A month ago, 10,000 people in Brussels ran a marathon.

Of the most of all Assyrians on the persecutions were their Assyrian relatives and acquaintances in the Iraq wanted to draw attention. 70,000 visitors were attracted to the event. Brussels seems more and more to develop, because many political decisions emanating from here the hub for persecution. Europe could make it clear with a unified voice that the respect for human rights in the Iran is a fundamental base for cooperation. Europe could more forcefully denounce executions and prevent at best. Ehsan Fattahian was executed on November 11, 2009 at four in the morning due to waste from the faith (apostasy), will no longer benefit from a commitment of Europe, but perhaps his death and the death of many others can Europeans carry the danger of national fanaticism as clear eyes, that human rights get a more prominent place on the political agenda. Freedom needs defend responsibility a the freedom of the population in the West with soldiers of the Hindukush, while others look carefully what is happening in the Middle East and what kind of stimulus there need the support of the West.

A face for freedom”is a solidarity action for people in the Iran venture that for their human rights despite impending torture and harsh punishments on the road to go. “In the Iran call some death Russia” or death Khamenei”and other Obama, you’re with you or are you with us?” It was for decades the United States in the streets of Tehran after the Friday prayer of death”and no one has objected publicly. Since the election in June, many disagree. The protesters are wondering whether to the United States in secret negotiations with the regime lull can and human sacrifice. The Tehran regime strikes hard. It will hit more hard, when the West sees more and more away. Many analysts believe a last gasp of the regime, which representative see the existence of Iran’s particular form of Government, velayat-e faghi, stand in front of the ruin. At the 30th anniversary of the occupation of the Embassy of the United States in Tehran on November 4, some demonstrators chanted even the ideals of the French Revolution: liberty, equality, fraternity. What will they sing on December 7, when the next protest is expected? It is important to look closely and to appoint brutality.

Youre Free Montazeri

A man who once had to lead the Iran died Saturday Grand Ayatollah Hoseyn Ali Montazeri died at the age of 87. He was considered one of the fiercest critics of the system of rule in the Iran, although he had worked (velayat-e faghi) once with Ayatollah Khomeini in the drafting of the rule of the Supreme of religious leader. Most recently, he was the ideological leader of the reform movement, which loved him because of his clear and open words against the Government. Now, his death seems to weaken the reform movement. At the same time, the regime responded with massive increase of police forces in Qom, where Montazeri is laid out. The Government fears that the opposition could use his funeral for further protests against the regime.

The concern is not unfounded. For one, the opposition has taken different occasions, on which the regime itself wanted to celebrate as an occasion for protests. So in November, on the day of the occupation of the American Embassy and most recently in early December, the day of the students. Several reform-oriented websites have in the Iran called on to travel to Qom and to participate in the funeral. In addition, the month of Muharram has begun. The first ten days spent in the memory of the martyr Hussein.

On 27 December Ashura, which traditionally thousands complaining day through the streets and scourge himself is. On that day, it might be hard and bloody confrontations with the opposition. In summer, Montazeri said the regime, since the last election, is at the end. Many Iranians in the head have this when they go on the road. You want to make their contribution, the legal opinion of a dignitary to make true. The late great Ayatollah had a sense of the people and felt from his understanding of religion out responsible. He condemned the executions of opposition 30 years ago and was then promptly pushed from the successor of Khomeini, his school closed and its importance was downplayed. But he accused the regime to set up a dictatorship in the name of Islam. His vision He sees a State Organization betrayed. For him, the clergy should exert only an advisory role and State and religion should be separate. “Montazeri said: everything has its limit and everything that exceeds its limit destroys itself.” He moved into this statement on a regime that peaceful protesters brutally beaten. Now he will not live to see the end of a dictatorship in the name of religion on the Earth, he is free. Montazeri, now you are free!”students called on Sunday on the campus of universities in Tehran. On Monday, they intend a upright defender of human values in the face of an inhuman system. However, you want to experience their liberty in this world. Helmut N. fork,