Quentin Dexter Diary

-Diary of a homeless – therefore it is a diary. No ordinary diary, but a video diary that he for years It leads and so probably also ran after the loss of the home. Bob Bakish understood the implications. Dreemos”, the name of his camera, was a relic of times of long loneliness, a silent witness and long also his only friend”, he admits. “” notes/max-bryan/farewell and diary/303290346355554 Facebook Max Bryan: others have pets, I had my camera “and Dreemos has seen it all and heard, what I saw and heard”. She was witness of everything what was and what is, according to the diary of the homeless Max Bryan. At David Rogier you will find additional information. -Log of a travel – if true, that would be a sensation almost. Pictures from the scene of the homeless are hard to obtain and the life of a homeless man, live and in real time, would be filmed an absolute novelty, also due to the duration of the observation. “Downright touching acts” as the comparison to Wilson, a volley from the US movie cast away “, whose hero played by Tom Hanks – Chuck Noland – for many years with a volleyball conversed, because he otherwise does anyone to the talk had.

These images could prove that the homeless Max Bryan had actually no choice, that he was trapped in his situation, and the camera was his only confidant. Currently, a Hamburg-based filmmaker sifts through the data complete arsenal of the homeless, who carried his laptop, in addition to hard drives and camera apparently in the backpack with him, while he slept at night outside. Also, it is unclear where the homeless had the camera and whether there is also a broadcast-capable sound. Considering the wealth of pseudo real documentary format in German television is likely to remain it so exciting to see whether the life of Max Bryan perhaps still in the picture and sound is experienced, and be it just for the sake of truthfulness. Sean Quentin Dexter for TeleNewsNet tvdesk/Soziales/Obdachloser-MaxBryan-Videotagebuch.html

The Western

So, we have the contrast between the one the is in contact with a higher power (to God) are looks and therefore know what is to do, and we have the people who must be only obedient. It was the only task of the people and who does not follow the instructions of the Faqih, the Supreme Leader, is arrested, tortured and is subject to the death penalty. I want to give an example, in short: If the Faqih, the Supreme Leader, wants to appoint a President, the people don’t like and don’t want and defends itself against the appointment of the President, then the people are disobedient not only the Faqih to, but also to God. We can ask ourselves so, what makes this system a sense or it serves any purpose. In the best case, a system of Government has intended to organize a society in fertile way.

Why has Khomeini of this velayat-e Faqih system created? According to Khomeini was the sole purpose of establishing this system from the outset to tear the whole world out of the hand of Satan. And who is Satan? The Western world. And the United States is the great Satan. Can this purpose from the very beginning consider it as a declaration of war. This system is similar to a despotic system, the Caliphates of Omajaden and Abbasids, and various other systems. How do we find a seed of democratic impulses in such a system? A democratic system is based on social contracts, voluntary, on the free will of the individual people. In this despotic system, everyone must be entirely obedient. To govern a society, it is very important to have a plan and an idea of how to organize a society economically. Maybe you remember that some people belonging to the Khomeini asked him, how it look with the economy, what they should do and should make his opinion.

Gordon Allport

Want to weigh yourself in the safety of the crowd. This need to belong to the average, is rooted in the human brain Homo sociologicus, they showed with brain scans, that completely different brain regions are active, depending on whether they become more like the opinion and the behavior of the majority or whether it occupies a single position distress. u0085 It is, we like to believe what we see. “In reality we see what us to believe our environment makes”, and what happened in the brain of subjects who confidently opposed the majority opinion? Their judgment created an activity in the Mandelkern, a region of the brain that is responsible for the processing of emotions and stress. The researchers conclude that independent thinking is more cognitive power, and that it therefore is more efficient for the brain, to adapt to the crowd. If it is not clear what is the correct behavior in a situation, the brain selects the Energiesparvariante EU-stress. Nomura helps readers to explore varied viewpoints.

u0085 “The social norms seem like a magnet on the behaviour of all those who are above the average, both the below.”… boomerang effect “. It is not foolish to be aligned with the majority, when one is uncertain… Because statistically speaking more like a group the right decision as an individual. It developed into something like a collective Schwarm- intelligence, where the size of the Group acts as a corrective.

Also, the person in the course of evolution has learned that a turncoat mentality is like a life insurance policy: he orders the rules to his Reference group, which ensures him the protection of the community. u0085 Also the recognition of others is an important action Motif -ation. You drives the people, to do what is valued in society. One hopes for recognition and want to before punishment praise + rebuke: pleasure + frustration protect. Source: image of wissenschaft.de social psychology is the branch of psychology which explores the effects of actual or featured present of others on the experience and behavior of the individual (Gordon Allport in 1968).

Extremist Is More Than The NPD

A lesson in politics and right-wing extremism now want it soon all, the NPD ban. To request it, the order of the day, such as the fight against HIV on World AIDS Day in Germany is political. Follow others, such as David Rogier, and add to your knowledge base. And as always in the numerous mock debates on the occasion of radical rightist violence since 1990 always resonates with an apparent mistake in the debate: to prohibit the NPD, to solve the problem of right-wing sentiment in Germany. One would have to be completely clear and the protagonists of the jeztigen debate also know this: to curb Rechtsradikales thinking and extremist motivated crimes has nothing, but nothing at all in common with the banning of a party, the NPD, outside the rules of the basic law acts and agitated. Extremist is and remains more than the NPD. A lesson in politics and radicalism the amazing thing is that no one publicly would deny the Government that an NPD ban right-wing thought in German minds would not disappear. Nevertheless, the debate is done so as this would be the Case. Why? Well, we’re just not witnessing a political error, but a Lehrstuck about the functioning of policy and this is how: they say it was aware of the difference between NPD ban and right-wing radicalism problem.

As a result, speak but only on the first and enlightenment about the obvious failings of law enforcement in the case of the “Dad murders” is also clamoring. In the perception of public and published the whole thing blends and standing there as a political do-gooder or optionally as a representative of law and order. Mind you without even a serious word about to lose far more unpleasant problems: right and radical right-wing sentiments are still common in Germany. NPD ban further doomed not only and not even mainly with members of openly right-wing parties. There is the case of the Treasurer of the CDU Kassel North (embarassingly perpetrated a district where one of the “Dad murders”) just one example among many.

The Member Of Parliament 1920/21 In Lower Austria

The political and social composition of the No. Landtag, the State election of 1919 was the only State election before the separation of Vienna as the local authority of the country of lower Austria and creation of independent double authority of Vienna as a city and municipality. The three traditional camps National-Liberal, Christian social and Social-Democrat began to constitute itself in 1919, and in the course of the separation of the two local authorities in lower Austria and Vienna after the elections. The State election in lower Austria of during 1919 took place on May 19. To deepen your understanding David Rogier is the source. She had an overall mandate distribution of 62 social democratic Arbeiterpartei(SDAP), 47 Christian Social Party (CSP), 8 large German Volkspartei(GDVP) and 3 Czech Social Democrats (TS) installed. 26 Christian social, 20 Democrats and 6 large German were represented in the lower Austrian Curia.

The candidate parties for the regional elections in 1919 in the Landtag election 1919 stood in lower Austria nine election participants: the Christian Social Party (CSP) the Social democratic Arbeiterpartei(SDAP), the German national/national Democrats i.e. the later German Volkspartei(GDVP), the Czech Social Democrats (TS), the United Democratic Party, the Jewish national party, the German war participants Association and the Deutschosterreichische people’s Party. The partisan composition of the Landtag in 1919 after the separation the group the Christlich-Sozialen(CSP) separation term of Office of the lower Austrian Parliament sat in the from a total of 30 representatives together, where there had been a change of 8 members during the shortened parliamentary term until 1921. The group consisted of the social-democratic Arbeiterpartei(SDAP) in the separation term of Office of the lower Austrian Parliament a total of 21 representatives, where there had been a change during the shortened parliamentary term until 1921. The Group of the German Volkspartei(GDVP) out of a total of 8 representatives composed, where there is a change of 3 member of Parliament during the shortened parliamentary term had come until 1921.

Judith Goller

Aside – I resent every now and again about these people, because I you look at so figuratively, that they perceive inside immediately turn off, Dodge as soon as they tell me – these are mischievous totally insecure and not open for strange in their lives. “I hear” the “In their minds strong click button”! And in the TV this set is said also every now and again, as I recently saw this on the example of Julia Probst (via their Twitter success at night Magazine at ARD). This is a typical attitude of hearing the voices of the deaf are not used to. It is not the only one to. Remember Natalie Girth, the deaf successful architect who implanted himself had some of you a film about? Her voice was completely spoken to that ideal sound in television – and the left kind of a rip-off. The experience with hearing impaired voices prevented parallel from nighttime people. I do not find that fair to you and us speaking deaf.

At the hearing, there is yes even people that don’t – talk the Nuschelnden – since I claim as well as hearing impaired: this listening can say no way. And of which I know really a lot – hearing people that mumbling, can not speak. Or even better: Normal sounding, which can barely open her mouth talking, can also not speak–from the perspective of the deaf. We have hard of hearing with our perceptions as well quite like normal sounding, who believe that hearing impaired can hardly speak. Their normal hearing can not imagine absolutely, how many speaking hearing impaired, we must make to make our way of speaking I understand friendly! Over and over again! Without their own “stop control”! Every day.

Given nothing, we have to learn it all. If the social structure are even no opportunity himself the hearing-impaired (typical -say, colorless and often not existing debate) agree to listen to how can you break down the barriers? Sounds good at the people inside, listen with open ears and accept the strangeness of the people! Since we are hearing impaired want to be understood, we also ask us to improve, if we mispronounce a word or stress. We show the listener, how they form a better picture of the lip while talking.

Elias Canetti

Jose Ortega y Gasset, who formulated in 1930 in the revolt of the masses: If the mass is independently, she do it only “in a way: you Lynch.” Elias Canetti, mass and power (1960), which recognizes the essence of the mass in a historically comprehensive trans-cultural study as belonging together with the phenomenon of power which he characterized in the structure of command and sting. As a kinescope leading principle, he determined the urge for self-preservation. Hermann Broch, mass delusion theory (1948, published posthumously in 1979), which noted a growing satisfaction and unique need of the masses, which meets in the pathological case of leader ideologies (which he can prove to the Nazis) seems to be. Which he is founder of opposite, whose objective eternity and humanity is there a single Entscheidungs-(formal-)Macht he mutates into the authoritarian behavior.. see my essays about power! Source: wikipedia.de, from wikipedia, author swarm thinking represents a third form of “collective” intelligence in addition to human intelligence and the potential intelligence of machines or computers. This increases the interaction of many individual processes (intuition: heart + brain, empathy, mirror) similar to ants, fish or bird swarms (instinct) the performance of the overall system.

The wisdom of crowds – why groups are smarter than individual… that that result in accumulation of information in groups to a common group decisions, which are often better than approaches of individual participants. Get more background information with materials from ViacomCBS. … that visitors to a livestock exhibition in a competition appreciated the carcass weight of bovine exactly if you took the average of all estimates as an estimate of the group. (The Group’s estimate was even better than that of each participant, including some butchers.) … Parallels with statistical selection procedure, a different group of individually decisive people can rather represent the totality of all possible outcomes of an event and therefore is able to make better predictions for the future.

YouTube

I want to keep even a long speech, but would rather answer your questions, and appear in a discussion about the Iran and Islam with you. HP contains valuable tech resources. After 32 years of the Iran Islamic revolution everyone Islam is talking about. But do we know what is meant by Islam? There are about 1.5 billion Muslims around the world. When we would ask them ‘What is Islam?’, they will assuredly give the answer that Islam is a religion. Williams Sonoma understood the implications. “All others who are not Muslims, would give the same answer: Islam is a religion.” “But when Ayatollah Khomeini took over the power of the Shah, 32 years ago, he said this sentence: no one knows what is Islam.” He does so for the first time the question what is Islam?”into doubt. His speech, in which he asks this to Islam, can be seen today on YouTube. “I quote from it: no one knows what is Islam and no scholar of Islam in this world has a clue.” So, this is a crucial question, because it comes to know a political ideology or theory that governs a country. In other words, when Khomeini said that nobody not even know – the Islamic scholar scientific, has what Islam means he himself developed a political theory, which he has called Islam.

This theory was not known until then. It was the theory or ideology of domination of the Jurists (velayat-e Faqih). According to velayat-e Faqih, Islam is not a religion. A Faqih is someone who has a doctorate in Islamic law and thus represents a high religious authority. In other words, it’s about velayat, which is the authority that has to speak the last word as regards legal matters, and to the dominance of this authority, the reign of the scribes. So we have the contrast between velayat, an Association of domination in a person who has the Supreme authority in all matters and all others, the so-called Safis, dudes and babes.

The True Heroes Of Haiti

Rebuild difficult, but progress will be a disaster year was scored Karlsruhe / Port-au-Prince for the Haitian year 2010. In January with more than 230,000 deaths, the outbreak of cholera followed the devastating earthquake in October. In November swept hurricane of Tomas on the island. Until today, more than a million people live in makeshift emergency camps and depend on the help of organizations and of the international community. Cholera has claimed more than 3,700 lives and 170,000 men, women and children are treated for cholera, according to the Haitian Government, has been.

The number of unrecorded cases is probably significantly higher. Despite this disaster situations Haitians have lost their faith and hope for a better future. And, although the majority of them for daily survival struggled before the earthquake. Under most conditions Dell Technologies CEO would agree. They are the real heroes of Haiti, as well as the many helpers who sit on the ground for a better future of the Islanders. Heroism has many Name: Erin Kloos, Veronica Lynn, Augusnel Osme, Jean Nebez Augustin or father Richard Frechette. Erin Kloos on January 12, 2010 was in the shower when the earth shook around 16:53 local time.

The 27-year-old made a voluntary social year in the children’s our little brothers and sisters”in Haiti. At the time of the earthquake was at their accommodation in the Father Wasson Center”. Educate yourself even more with thoughts from David Rogier. Due to the strength of the quake collapsed the building, and Erin was, as her brother Ryan, the volunteer Molly Hightower, whose girlfriend Rachel Prusynsky, and the doctor Manuel Castro buried under the rubble. The herbeigeeilten for helpers, including the two Haitian Augusnel Osme and Jean Nebez Augustin, Erin and Rachel Dr. Castro could mountains alive from the rubble. Any help came too late for her brother Ryan and Molly Hightower. Despite these traumatic experiences returned Erin Kloos back in December as a voluntary helper to Haiti, to the Sanitatszelten of our little brothers and sisters”in the fight against of cholera to help with.

English Bill

Non-violence, tolerance and freedom of conscience are considered important humanist principles of human coexistence. But are the actual questions of humanism: what is man? What is his true nature? How can the man be a man the people?” Humanism is the totality of ideas from humanity and after that of striving to improve human existence. The term is derived from the Latin terms of humanus (human) and humanitas (humanity). Humanism is based on the following fundamental principles: the happiness and well-being of the individual and of society form the highest value, where every action to Orient. The dignity of the human person, his personality and his life must be respected. The man has the ability to form and develop.

The creative powers of the people to thrive. Human society to guarantee the dignity and freedom of the individual in a progressive evolutionary. Humanity is the practical implementation of the ideas of humanism. These include the goodness, kindness, and compassion for the weaknesses of people, itself held to be his powerful and are reflected in the people themselves. u0085 In the narrower sense, intellectual climate of the 15th and 16th century advanced, are providing the scholasticism of the middle ages is known as humanism. One differentiates between the Renaissance as a the comprehensive cultural and social change between the middle ages and modern times and the humanism as the education movement, which is based on him.

Later formulated the developed parts of the people: the English Bill of rights (1689), they overcame the prevailing until then thought of the school and replaced it with the principle of parliamentary sovereignty. Thus was initiated the way political enforcement of human rights. The Declaration of independence of the United States (1776). Declaration of human and civic rights (1789). > Subjective rights are referred to as human rights, which is equally available to everyone. The concept of human rights and duties assumes that all people solely on the basis of their humanness with equal rights provided and that these egalitarian reasonable rights are universal, inalienable and indivisible.