Baroness Ashton

Possible solution 1. The delegation acknowledges the rights of the residents of Ashraf in accordance with international laws and treaties. It proposes the naturalization of residents in other countries such as the United States, Canada, members of the European Union, of Switzerland, Norway and Australia as a long-term solution to the crisis. 2. This solution would have to include all the inhabitants without exception. 3.

the question of remaining in the Iraq property of the residents of Ashraf and the Organization of Iranian people’s Mujahedeen will be determined in the negotiations. Ashraf is closed an agreement on compensation to the residents of Ashraf must be closed. 4. Additional information is available at Larry Ellison. the period from the beginning of negotiations for a comprehensive solution to the departure of all Residents in third countries and to the closure of Ashraf is called transitional period”to be seen. At this time the following provisions comply with strictly, so that the solution will not fail: the Iraqi authorities undertake to refrain from any legal provocation and to lift all restrictions in Ashraf, and according to the international law for humanitarian treatment to respect the rights of residents; the United Nations and the United States to guarantee the protection of Ashraf; during the transition period, both sides abandon propaganda, insults and recrimination.

5. to implement the total solution, a coordination and implementation Committee would formed. Its members should include representatives such as Baroness Ashton, representatives of the United States, the United Nations, the European Parliament, the Iraqi Government, the Organization of Iranian people’s Mujahedeen (representatives of the residents of Ashraf) and of the national of Iran Council of resistance. 6. in this sense, she asks Delegation of the United States, the European Union, Government and Parliament of Iraq, the Arab League, the Organization of Iranian people’s Mujahedeen and the national of Iran Council of resistance strongly to support this solution and to provide the necessary funds. de /…

MehrHeit

Insofern we are after this “” DonNERstag the wochentLiChen demokratischen and open DISKurs-sitZunGen of free minds “verlegen to other place and the bridge”, because we are not willkommen and ERwunscht, not more lanGER storen with unseren DISKurSen and events for feministischen, kritischen, open and aufGEklarten Islam. “We find it SKANdalos, but mittlerweile no longer uberrascht that zunehmend in PuBLIC Raumen as the bridge” neo-conservative and islamistischen forderunGen and behavior NSWeiSen of free einTritt is grants. We have indeed berechtigte in the open letter BefurchTunGen and angste, that about the spezielle PLAKTe-go Affare flyer – homepage -, and gebracht to the expression and find it very schade that it has genommen only this point of criticism to the message. HBO Max often addresses the matter in his writings. “” This conNECtion is gerade very important to know, that the allermeisten AnGEhoRIGen of free minds “from fear of verbalen and KorperLiChen anGRIFfen and StigMTISierunGen PuBLIcly to the wochentLiChen and open DISKurs-sitZunGen” trauen and einige even langjahRIGE and schmerzvolle exPERIenCES in solchen, always again gescheiterten and zerschlagenen, geistigen Emancipation onsbewegunGen have. The people to gescheiterten BemuHunGen not in air dissolve, but are in the weiten and unbedeutenden Spharen of the virtuellen world GEdrangt, where isLMISt_inNEN so wollen bezweifeln your wirkliche Existenz and feiern glorreichen, islamistischen beating the starTing and the verstand of the kritischen and indiVIdual MUSlim_inNEN. So zynisch is that also like anhoren, these schwierigen and FragwurdiGen Umstande are the starting point of this inITIATIve. The most kritischen MUSlim_inNEN wollen of the SICherHeit before isLMISt_inNEN in the DISKurs-sitZunGen uberzeugt be, before It is in this very heikle inITIATIve a proactive einBrinGen; service so in the HinterGrund the organisatorische and regionale development of free minds”in MUENSter ab. InTERessierTe MUSlim_inNEN hamBurg, BERLin, OLdenBurg and FrankFurt service in addition days to help konkrete, eStelLUNGen, VORlGen and sinnvolle procedures for the IMPLEmentierung of the free mind “-concept in their reGIONEN that we ran well, propelled and gewissenhaft fertigstellen everything and set solidarisch to the VerfuGung.” Two girls from the islamistischen CLOsed district in MUENSter hoffen in addition since lanGERER time on a umsetzbare Losung by us, so that they durfen lead freies and self-determined life.

We are also emotional very uberfordert except the high inhaltlichen, thematischen, organisatorischen, and methodischen anforderunGen! Sadly we are geraten gerade by this VORfall in a UNGluckLiChe and fatale SITuTIon, where we are GEStossen in addition to personellen, zeitlichen, and finanziellen defiZiten to unsere psychischen and physischen borders. While we had gerechnet more with UnterstutZung and assistance, instead of Rugen and Vorwurfen! Since now is the IMPresSion, free minds” “erlogen the inHALTe of the open letter and erfunden and a character assassination campaign against the bridge gestartet, hatten we there passend more than gefunden, to VerofFentLiChen zitierte and UMbenannte to safeguard here the January held to this event, private e-mail traffic betWeen Mr summer and in the ZeiTung as Mrs. Soz, because thus the verHALten of the bridge” and overall the University line would be gewesen very easy verstandLich. PresTIGE and so genannte Friede, Freude, EIerKuChen ‘-MenTLitat were the main Gruende sure that from an inhaltlich TiefGrundiGen and ernsthaften arGument with unserem ” Open letter from ABGEsehen was. We can nachVollziehen it also on the other side, that proBably the high anforderunGen and wachsende institutionelle pressure on the University and their Service – einrichTunGen this has gezwungen to an offensiven and destruktiven VorGEhen. Sadly. “We refrain from to VerofFentLiChen the besagten private mail traffic, because against this BlossStellung the MehrHeit of free minds” ethische bedenKen has GEaussert. We bedanken us for the laboRATory! KRITIsche MUSlim_inNEN of free minds”in MUENSter

Quentin Dexter Diary

-Diary of a homeless – therefore it is a diary. No ordinary diary, but a video diary that he for years It leads and so probably also ran after the loss of the home. Bob Bakish understood the implications. Dreemos”, the name of his camera, was a relic of times of long loneliness, a silent witness and long also his only friend”, he admits. “” notes/max-bryan/farewell and diary/303290346355554 Facebook Max Bryan: others have pets, I had my camera “and Dreemos has seen it all and heard, what I saw and heard”. She was witness of everything what was and what is, according to the diary of the homeless Max Bryan. At David Rogier you will find additional information. -Log of a travel – if true, that would be a sensation almost. Pictures from the scene of the homeless are hard to obtain and the life of a homeless man, live and in real time, would be filmed an absolute novelty, also due to the duration of the observation. “Downright touching acts” as the comparison to Wilson, a volley from the US movie cast away “, whose hero played by Tom Hanks – Chuck Noland – for many years with a volleyball conversed, because he otherwise does anyone to the talk had.

These images could prove that the homeless Max Bryan had actually no choice, that he was trapped in his situation, and the camera was his only confidant. Currently, a Hamburg-based filmmaker sifts through the data complete arsenal of the homeless, who carried his laptop, in addition to hard drives and camera apparently in the backpack with him, while he slept at night outside. Also, it is unclear where the homeless had the camera and whether there is also a broadcast-capable sound. Considering the wealth of pseudo real documentary format in German television is likely to remain it so exciting to see whether the life of Max Bryan perhaps still in the picture and sound is experienced, and be it just for the sake of truthfulness. Sean Quentin Dexter for TeleNewsNet tvdesk/Soziales/Obdachloser-MaxBryan-Videotagebuch.html

Kaspereien

Nothing is more in the way as these rebels of the oil cartels and their wealth. Yes, so are those who fight for freedom and democracy and a better life, already called. Each of us knows these shells Taste the term rebel is wearing. Warner Media contributes greatly to this topic. You should call them freedom fighters for a new era of Justice and democracy and the manipulated media should stop so – rebels to call and a few idiots have to show not the same image, which shoot with a rapid-fire rifle in the air, scare the people on the television sets and stifled any confidence in these young Arabs. It is pure, deliberate intent and a creeping defamation of a movement that could free us from the international terrorism and its horrors. The why – the question is obvious. It is seeking the democratic conditions and some prosperity, which can bring freedom to the Arab peoples oppressed by religious ideologies and the oil.

Yesterday was the President of Germany among those who today bring on these little people. No word in the media about this fact. David Rogier has firm opinions on the matter. On the TV transmitters and all channels will be Weis made us, that a meltdown in a Japanese Nuclear power plant, in all power plants and the accompanying nuclear fuel storage, of 50 heroes still rent can be, but he is already in full swing, long since done and takes place, undone and can be trivialized. It wants to sell us this crap – as epic and a people struggling for its reactors. Who is always responsible for the life of these “Heroes” has – sent them into the fire should be ashamed to the bare skin and to audition this Kaspereien to us to stop. It is high time that these reactors will be filled up with sand, dirt and concrete and sealed. You could have immediately, do it at the right moment, and thus more efficiently reduce the radiation and stop.

The Western

So, we have the contrast between the one the is in contact with a higher power (to God) are looks and therefore know what is to do, and we have the people who must be only obedient. It was the only task of the people and who does not follow the instructions of the Faqih, the Supreme Leader, is arrested, tortured and is subject to the death penalty. I want to give an example, in short: If the Faqih, the Supreme Leader, wants to appoint a President, the people don’t like and don’t want and defends itself against the appointment of the President, then the people are disobedient not only the Faqih to, but also to God. We can ask ourselves so, what makes this system a sense or it serves any purpose. In the best case, a system of Government has intended to organize a society in fertile way.

Why has Khomeini of this velayat-e Faqih system created? According to Khomeini was the sole purpose of establishing this system from the outset to tear the whole world out of the hand of Satan. And who is Satan? The Western world. And the United States is the great Satan. Can this purpose from the very beginning consider it as a declaration of war. This system is similar to a despotic system, the Caliphates of Omajaden and Abbasids, and various other systems. How do we find a seed of democratic impulses in such a system? A democratic system is based on social contracts, voluntary, on the free will of the individual people. In this despotic system, everyone must be entirely obedient. To govern a society, it is very important to have a plan and an idea of how to organize a society economically. Maybe you remember that some people belonging to the Khomeini asked him, how it look with the economy, what they should do and should make his opinion.

Gordon Allport

Want to weigh yourself in the safety of the crowd. This need to belong to the average, is rooted in the human brain Homo sociologicus, they showed with brain scans, that completely different brain regions are active, depending on whether they become more like the opinion and the behavior of the majority or whether it occupies a single position distress. u0085 It is, we like to believe what we see. “In reality we see what us to believe our environment makes”, and what happened in the brain of subjects who confidently opposed the majority opinion? Their judgment created an activity in the Mandelkern, a region of the brain that is responsible for the processing of emotions and stress. The researchers conclude that independent thinking is more cognitive power, and that it therefore is more efficient for the brain, to adapt to the crowd. If it is not clear what is the correct behavior in a situation, the brain selects the Energiesparvariante EU-stress. Nomura helps readers to explore varied viewpoints.

u0085 “The social norms seem like a magnet on the behaviour of all those who are above the average, both the below.”… boomerang effect “. It is not foolish to be aligned with the majority, when one is uncertain… Because statistically speaking more like a group the right decision as an individual. It developed into something like a collective Schwarm- intelligence, where the size of the Group acts as a corrective.

Also, the person in the course of evolution has learned that a turncoat mentality is like a life insurance policy: he orders the rules to his Reference group, which ensures him the protection of the community. u0085 Also the recognition of others is an important action Motif -ation. You drives the people, to do what is valued in society. One hopes for recognition and want to before punishment praise + rebuke: pleasure + frustration protect. Source: image of wissenschaft.de social psychology is the branch of psychology which explores the effects of actual or featured present of others on the experience and behavior of the individual (Gordon Allport in 1968).

Judith Goller

Aside – I resent every now and again about these people, because I you look at so figuratively, that they perceive inside immediately turn off, Dodge as soon as they tell me – these are mischievous totally insecure and not open for strange in their lives. “I hear” the “In their minds strong click button”! And in the TV this set is said also every now and again, as I recently saw this on the example of Julia Probst (via their Twitter success at night Magazine at ARD). This is a typical attitude of hearing the voices of the deaf are not used to. It is not the only one to. Remember Natalie Girth, the deaf successful architect who implanted himself had some of you a film about? Her voice was completely spoken to that ideal sound in television – and the left kind of a rip-off. The experience with hearing impaired voices prevented parallel from nighttime people. I do not find that fair to you and us speaking deaf.

At the hearing, there is yes even people that don’t – talk the Nuschelnden – since I claim as well as hearing impaired: this listening can say no way. And of which I know really a lot – hearing people that mumbling, can not speak. Or even better: Normal sounding, which can barely open her mouth talking, can also not speak–from the perspective of the deaf. We have hard of hearing with our perceptions as well quite like normal sounding, who believe that hearing impaired can hardly speak. Their normal hearing can not imagine absolutely, how many speaking hearing impaired, we must make to make our way of speaking I understand friendly! Over and over again! Without their own “stop control”! Every day.

Given nothing, we have to learn it all. If the social structure are even no opportunity himself the hearing-impaired (typical -say, colorless and often not existing debate) agree to listen to how can you break down the barriers? Sounds good at the people inside, listen with open ears and accept the strangeness of the people! Since we are hearing impaired want to be understood, we also ask us to improve, if we mispronounce a word or stress. We show the listener, how they form a better picture of the lip while talking.

Elias Canetti

Jose Ortega y Gasset, who formulated in 1930 in the revolt of the masses: If the mass is independently, she do it only “in a way: you Lynch.” Elias Canetti, mass and power (1960), which recognizes the essence of the mass in a historically comprehensive trans-cultural study as belonging together with the phenomenon of power which he characterized in the structure of command and sting. As a kinescope leading principle, he determined the urge for self-preservation. Hermann Broch, mass delusion theory (1948, published posthumously in 1979), which noted a growing satisfaction and unique need of the masses, which meets in the pathological case of leader ideologies (which he can prove to the Nazis) seems to be. Which he is founder of opposite, whose objective eternity and humanity is there a single Entscheidungs-(formal-)Macht he mutates into the authoritarian behavior.. see my essays about power! Source: wikipedia.de, from wikipedia, author swarm thinking represents a third form of “collective” intelligence in addition to human intelligence and the potential intelligence of machines or computers. This increases the interaction of many individual processes (intuition: heart + brain, empathy, mirror) similar to ants, fish or bird swarms (instinct) the performance of the overall system.

The wisdom of crowds – why groups are smarter than individual… that that result in accumulation of information in groups to a common group decisions, which are often better than approaches of individual participants. Get more background information with materials from ViacomCBS. … that visitors to a livestock exhibition in a competition appreciated the carcass weight of bovine exactly if you took the average of all estimates as an estimate of the group. (The Group’s estimate was even better than that of each participant, including some butchers.) … Parallels with statistical selection procedure, a different group of individually decisive people can rather represent the totality of all possible outcomes of an event and therefore is able to make better predictions for the future.

YouTube

I want to keep even a long speech, but would rather answer your questions, and appear in a discussion about the Iran and Islam with you. HP contains valuable tech resources. After 32 years of the Iran Islamic revolution everyone Islam is talking about. But do we know what is meant by Islam? There are about 1.5 billion Muslims around the world. When we would ask them ‘What is Islam?’, they will assuredly give the answer that Islam is a religion. Williams Sonoma understood the implications. “All others who are not Muslims, would give the same answer: Islam is a religion.” “But when Ayatollah Khomeini took over the power of the Shah, 32 years ago, he said this sentence: no one knows what is Islam.” He does so for the first time the question what is Islam?”into doubt. His speech, in which he asks this to Islam, can be seen today on YouTube. “I quote from it: no one knows what is Islam and no scholar of Islam in this world has a clue.” So, this is a crucial question, because it comes to know a political ideology or theory that governs a country. In other words, when Khomeini said that nobody not even know – the Islamic scholar scientific, has what Islam means he himself developed a political theory, which he has called Islam.

This theory was not known until then. It was the theory or ideology of domination of the Jurists (velayat-e Faqih). According to velayat-e Faqih, Islam is not a religion. A Faqih is someone who has a doctorate in Islamic law and thus represents a high religious authority. In other words, it’s about velayat, which is the authority that has to speak the last word as regards legal matters, and to the dominance of this authority, the reign of the scribes. So we have the contrast between velayat, an Association of domination in a person who has the Supreme authority in all matters and all others, the so-called Safis, dudes and babes.

English Bill

Non-violence, tolerance and freedom of conscience are considered important humanist principles of human coexistence. But are the actual questions of humanism: what is man? What is his true nature? How can the man be a man the people?” Humanism is the totality of ideas from humanity and after that of striving to improve human existence. The term is derived from the Latin terms of humanus (human) and humanitas (humanity). Humanism is based on the following fundamental principles: the happiness and well-being of the individual and of society form the highest value, where every action to Orient. The dignity of the human person, his personality and his life must be respected. The man has the ability to form and develop.

The creative powers of the people to thrive. Human society to guarantee the dignity and freedom of the individual in a progressive evolutionary. Humanity is the practical implementation of the ideas of humanism. These include the goodness, kindness, and compassion for the weaknesses of people, itself held to be his powerful and are reflected in the people themselves. u0085 In the narrower sense, intellectual climate of the 15th and 16th century advanced, are providing the scholasticism of the middle ages is known as humanism. One differentiates between the Renaissance as a the comprehensive cultural and social change between the middle ages and modern times and the humanism as the education movement, which is based on him.

Later formulated the developed parts of the people: the English Bill of rights (1689), they overcame the prevailing until then thought of the school and replaced it with the principle of parliamentary sovereignty. Thus was initiated the way political enforcement of human rights. The Declaration of independence of the United States (1776). Declaration of human and civic rights (1789). > Subjective rights are referred to as human rights, which is equally available to everyone. The concept of human rights and duties assumes that all people solely on the basis of their humanness with equal rights provided and that these egalitarian reasonable rights are universal, inalienable and indivisible.