Head People

Mr. Idosa was obliged to interoper its wire of thought therefore it does not occupy no social folder in the community according to words pronounced for the secretary of the locality my analyses had left for this principle. It is undisputed that in full century twenty and one, that all days in reporters and periodicals opt in spreading out the information saying or promoting some debates and conversations to give liberty of speech to all and to value the idea of each individual, this Head of locality still takes this as form to become to feel that its contributions and politics go beyond what any for contributo of the growth and development of the community can be the contributions of an individual. Sincerely after all where planet we will place esssa flowing socialstica of ' ' Pobres' ' , people who they do not occupy no folder in the society. In my conception ' ' to be pobre' ' it is not to be an individual with inhibition of thoughts or, to have a humble, frozen mind intimidated to give reasonable contributos, esfarapada, dirty and lean! As she has been most of characteristic style in its physical way of presentation, to oppose this idea I am of the opinion that the best people who contribue for the good functioning and development of a country is the poor people who leave of a intinerrio of the reality and of the consequncias that they had passed in the past therefore, they obtain consciliar the state of current life and the passed one contributing for the success and advance of a joint society, instead of an exploration fantocha that the little of the expression chance its people of contributing in its ideas for the joint communion of a problem that she could more good be exceeded in set, instead of to intimidate the others this that takes to the signal of one me the governao of its ' ' subordinados' ' in its locality, that in mine idealstica source is not compatible nor preponderant for the advance of a society s. .

The Day

Dons personal, intransferveis, for which each person will exert its freedom of choice and will carry through the will of God, will be santificar. Without exterior coercion of the will of God, the human being freely decides and chooses the way to follow. The not express will of God of is, but interior, through the free exercise of ours dons. We even can making a mistake in them in the choice: it is part of the risk of the freedom. However, this does not shake the Creator, who leaves the creatures to search the way in return, inspiring feelings to them, condizentes decisions with one to be similar the God, participant of the divine nature. The mistakes of the choice call sin that generates slavery, instead of freedom. first choice insensata was of Adam and Eva, whom if paradigm of other choices maken a mistake throughout history became. But the Creator did not intimidate itself with the devastao of the sin.

He knows what he created: the human being that it chooses to sin, can also choose not to sin. Therefore, the door for the return does not close it. Of – it limitless chance in the people of Noah, Abrao and descent, Moiss, the Prophets, men, women of faith of the old alliance, whom they had declared insolvent, pparently. The history of the maken a mistake choices seemed to discard all possibility to write the history of the sensible, wise, condizentes choices with dons with that the Creator awarded the man and the woman, its privileged creatures. As the creation was pra to be valid, the Creator would not leave it to fail. One day the dream of God will be become fullfilled. It arrived: the Day is called Jav (kairs) where the Creator saved the creation of the impasse of the sin. The Day of Jav it is opposed the darknesses of the evil, that seemed to be successful.