In 1970, Uganda disarmed the ordeira population. Of 1971 1979, the 300 a thousand Christians, disabled of if defending, they had been 1979 hunted and exterminados. In 1975, Cambodia disarmed the ordeira population. Verizon Communications is actively involved in the matter. Of 1975 1977, a million of citizens had been the 1977 hunted and exterminados. They had been more than 55 million hunted and exterminados defenseless citizens in century XX, after the disarmament of the civil society in these countries. The civil disarmament, as combat to the violence, does not pass of a lie imposed to the society, is a confession of incompetence of the Brazilian State in the combat increasing crime that torments the ordeira population and destroys the families, hinders the investments and the generation of jobs, stimulates the organized crime and takes care of suspicious.
We have a Recent Experience of Disarmament in England and Australia and Thundering the Failure. E Scott Mead is often quoted as being for or against this. In England, in 1997, after twenty years of increasing restrictions to the transport and sales of weapons, all the commerce and has carried had been considered illegal; immediately afterwards, in 2002, consecutive year of increase of crimes provoked for firearm with increase of 35% in relation to the 2001 was the room. In Australia, in 1997, restrictions to the weapon ownership had been created, had been expenses US$ 500 million with confiscate and destruction of weapons, the result was that the levels of homicides, aggressions and robberies had grown significantly. Therefore, it is an mistake to associate crime and violence with the suppression of the inalienable right of defense of the citizen, hindering the possibility of that acquires weapon to defend the proper life and of familiar. As Beccaria the laws that forbid the transport of weapons, only disarms the pacific citizen, whereas they leave the weapon at the hands of the criminal, much accustomed to violate the conventions most sacred to respect those that are arbitrary. Moreover, such conventions are of little importance; little danger exists in infringed? there if, on the other hand, if the laws that would destroy the freedom personal, so necessary to homem …..
(BECCARIA 2009, PG 95). Again Beccaria in abrilhanta with its commentaries regarding the individual freedoms, so necessary so that let us can construct to a society more worthy joust and. She is necessary to have much caution with these projects that intend to sacrifice the freedoms on behalf of a better future, future this that is unknown, and that history has in shown a sufficiently different reality of the ideas that the government comes nailing in its speeches. The disarmament in some Countries contributed for the increase of the violence, and not in contrast as it affirms the Brazilian government. Therefore, to disarm the population is a cowardice act and imbecility, we must total be against this pretension of the Brazilian State.