The balance is usually dealt consolidated, and as the plans in mid-year adjusted, it is unclear how to relate to the fact that the plan is almost always coincides with the fact that, differing sometimes only a fraction of percent. It makes you want to cry when reading these works of art economic, “Oh, well done, the planners! Good plan! “. That’s the way the state controls, owns what. Our group in a relatively short period of time developed a method that allows the state to effectively manage their assets. Since the quarterly accounting reports are collected electronically, and already there information and accounting center for the State Property Committee, we are asked to write a tiny program that counts on a quarterly basis according to formulas 25 coefficients are used for financial analysis and accounting reports well known to any financial analyst.
The calculation results are stored in the database, and then analyzed by a separate program. As data accumulated in the balance sheets of an accounting information and the center of the last few years, we have proposed to use them to calculate the coefficients. Analysis program was to analyze seasonal fluctuations, changes in the 25 coefficients calculated based on the results quarterly reports for each enterprise, to compare these variations with those companies (if any were found), to construct the corresponding graphs, and when it detects a non-standard behavior chart, report operator to the list of troubled companies, which can be quickly directed the commission to verify the situation (thank God, the controlling authorities in many countries of the CIS). In addition, for the year, the program should generate a ranking of enterprises based on the calculation of an integral indicator of successful management, which was calculated on the basis of those indicators for which a manager can influence.