Paraguayan Right

That is to say, in the compared right not slo must to consider the Peruvian right but tambin the foreigner, for which different tools in first from mentioned for example microcomparacin, macrocomparacin, recepcin, recepcin exist internal, recepcin external, transplant, comparison, internal transplant, external transplant, uniformizacin, armonizacin, among others, that is to say, in broad strokes, stas are some of the tools of the compared right, which must be known by the students of this jurdica discipline and in any case to differentiate between the right studied with the foreign right that in the Peruvian case, podra to be Mexican, American Argentine, Colombian, Uruguayan, Paraguayan, Bolivian, Brazilian, Spanish right, francs, Italian, alemn,, Belgian, of Andorra, among others, that is to say, is right different, nevertheless, are related for study effects, which must be matter of investigation on the part of the treaty writers. Others including baby clothes, offer their opinions as well. For example the Peruvian right with the right can be compared alemn, or the Peruvian right with the right francs, or the Peruvian right with the Spanish right, or the Peruvian right with the Bolivian right, or the Peruvian right with the Argentine right, or the Argentine right with the Bolivian right, or the Argentine right with the Mexican right, or the Peruvian enterprise right with the Spanish mercantile right, or the civil jurisprudence of the executory right alemn and Italian with the Peruvians, among others possibilities, that is to say, the studied right, that are the well-known jurdica discipline as straight compared is very extensive and generally it has matured little like its development is little within the Peruvian right, nevertheless, in others pases the same it reaches major development, in such sense tambin can become comparisons between the compared Peruvian right with the compared Bolivian right, or between the compared Argentine right with the compared Bolivian right, or between the right francs compared with the right alemn compared, or between the compared Italian right with the compared Mexican right, among others possibilities, thus, we can to affirm that the compared right Peruvian comparndolo with the compared right francs, Spanish and American, first reaches little or relative development, which it must be matter of study on the part of the treaty writers, nevertheless, at first we can affirm that one causes can be that in right saying it does not exist maestras nor doctorates in this jurdica discipline, which can be one of the main causes, which habra motivated that in the Peruvian right the compared right little reach development, and this must be matter of works of investigation in separated form by each branch of the right.