The rise of European fascism and the cold war, then prevented a detailed reading of this work, more a questioning beyond specific was dealing with a generic question: of the objections that deserved the Organization as it was emerging from modernity until the enlightenment. To fly pen, we remember the questioning to what then motejaria as Nomenklatuura, by dissident Djilas in his new class. Thus Norkotte Parkinson and their laws on bureaucracy. Remember the criticism against centralism and bureaucracy, created from the experiences of the real socialsimo. The American fubncionalismo, coined from: the functional autonomy of motives.
Not long ago, I listened to a human resources specialist, affirm, that any organization that exceed the thousand people is unmanageable. It seems a fruitful hypothesis claim that the Gigantism of the organizations has finished neutralizing the principles that inspired them. Contractual, was enhervado, by everything that rationalism leave outside its horizons. Thus it could not with the leadership (or principles of leadership), with the everlasting fight for power, with what Pareto called the persistence of the aggregates and the neophobia. Between explicitly manifest in each statute or contract corporate social objectives, and what is latent, comes having large gaps. Large organizations, eventually encapsulate, serving the specific needs of its members, particularly those who occupy positions of leadership, and the objectives for which were explicitly you are created, they are overlooked or in junior roles. Many times, those of the final recipients of the objectives of each organization, only some are achieved in its benefits, for the sole purpose of giving the appearances of the fulfilment of the objectives of the respective organisation. The eventual objection, that the Organization attaches the human condition, we anticipate clarifying that we refer to the Western type organization. Those pernickety structures organized / functional with its corresponding descriptive memorandum of tasks. organic regulations, statutes or manuals of organization, which in the majority of cases serve as a reference to see the organizations that work in his round, but always distorting its purposes.