Limits Countries

Concerning the Club of Rome and its results we find in the words of L.D. Oliveira the importance of this event: ' ' A very important study for to mark this definitive one enlace between the thought bourgeois and? salvation of the nature? it is? Limits of the Growth? (1971), where a group of thirty people of ten countries, between scientists, educators, economists and industrials, had been congregated in Rome to study? problems of the humanity? its? consequences for the future? ' ' (2001 P. 15). Eric Kuby wanted to know more. This report disclosed a future pessimistic, with the scarcity in few years of many basic resources for the vitality of the capitalism. This apocalyptic tone if atrelou launching of neomalthusianas conceptions, (that it is present also in the conception of sustainable development), that has for objective to make a relation between population and ambient degradation (as already boarded), then, the peripheral countries, treated at this moment as countries to Third World, would be most responsible for the ambient degradation (mainly the numerous poor population of these countries). In the womb of this quarrel also the idea appears of ' ' growth zero' ' , proclaimed for the elites central offices I look with it to congeal the economic growth of the peripheral countries, in view of ' ' health of planeta' '. Stolen Celso economist, who also already was mentioned as one of the critics of the desenvolvimentismo, writes part of the book ' ' The myth of desenvolvimento' ' inside with this ideological atmosphere (in 1974), and it disagrees, deeply, of the interests of ' ' to solve the crisis ambiental' ' of the Club of Rome and mainly of the report ' ' Limits of the Crescimento' ' , and it in such a way comments in this book how much in the book ' ' Airs of mundo' ' , that it makes a story on the experiences of the author in this period (published in 1991). .