One feels humiliated by these activities. The student asks the psychologist who nonreport to which she has gone to him by the possible retaliation. The psychologist consults with the tutor of the student and this one him it informs that it has not noticed anything special, unless the economic yield is not very good. The psychologist receives a note on the following day, to the demand, insisting to him to that he does not take part. Starting off of most generic, Respect to the human dignity, we were with several Principles of the Psicotica: Charity, by which the action of the psychologist must try the good for the people with whom it has responsibility. The one of Not-slander, by which the psychologist must avoid, at any moment, to cause a damage to its patients with its action.
This he is to have minimum, essential and basic, that he will have to be present in any case that appears a psychologist to him. When a person solicits the services of a psychologist are evident that it hopes not to be harmed by the acts of the professional. This it must help to solve to his problems or difficulties him, that are what it is expected of him and are the main reason for which the patients go to consultation. And the one of Justice, because the intention must be to try that the patient it has access to an improvement of its health. Between the Psicoticas Rules, in this case the one of the Confidentiality one becomes of difficult application, because the consequences it seems that they could be bad for the student in anyone of the cases, whether maintains the confidentiality on the information that has received as if it does not maintain it. They consider to us, then, the first dilemmas, in the case of a junior, which is to have of a professional before the knowledge of a possible action that is damaging the person, in this minor case, that it goes to consultation? Until where the principle must arrive at which also is forced the psychologist in its practice: the confidentiality, in the case of a junior.