The constancy with that Federal Policia dismantles group of thieves of all the shades country measures, does not arrive to be alentador, but discouraging, such the volume and its ramifications for all the fields of the society. In its majority, they are groups that embezzle the Public State treasury in one officiate of robbery that discloses to be not about recent groups, but of very old mfias. Vrusda corruption that parches in our society and affects the nature of the nation can be seen as an epidemic? Which the actions to prevent its dissemination? Or, already in such a way so it is taken root in our veins that nobody of it escapes? The virus of the corruption seems not to have cure? Or it has one ' ' coquetel' ' of measures capable to control it or extinguiz it? Or the only way to fight it beyond laws and strong institutions, is the constant monitoring of the society in permanent autocuidado? All the virus contains autofgico element. When destroying its host to feed itself of it finishes if destroying. This manifest destruction if in a done society of internal diffidence e, the same, time in a nation that if presents as a paradise of the indolncia, the robbery, impunity. The end of the Brazilian society will be this, total taken for the virus of the embezzlement, the tax evasion, ' ' to take advantage to any custo' '? They are all waiting only its chance to say: ' ' now vez' is mine; '? Or, worse, those that to pautarem its character for the principles of justice and the same honesty in the minimum things of the daily one, will be reason of public execrao? He is tragic and discouraging to make such forecast, but observing everything that there is e, still more, what it seems, always it was, it is impossible there to think of another form. The virtue, the honesty, the respect for what he is not ours, for what it is of the common good, public, is not one badly in the conscience and character of the great majority of the Brazilians, we affirm. Still it is possible to believe this? Or these are the exception? The rule is those that already are contumacious people in the media and the police pages? Although if it observes the police actions disclosing an extensive and perennial teia of corruption and robbery between the public beings and politicians is evident that its spring is of the governmental sphere. If the corrupt one appears in bigger evidence in the public, what if it sees the corruptor is always private. It will be that to arrive at the power it is where level and instance will be, is the definitive test of the character of the individual, in its mesquinhez and vileness or its largeness and nobility? The reality has shown that these last ones seem each time rarer in that they reach some power is for the vote, for public competition or for its merit inside of the capitalist market that is which will be its ideology.