Two cases may occur at this point. Either the information match (case 1), what causes repetition of information already stored and prevents therefore any loss of information. or is it a contrasting case (case 2). When conscious comparing of the information not related due to missing information in the experienced is manufactured. So you’re the new information in experience. The details of what he had experienced and stored in the memory are processed in the imagination.
Thereby, I distinguish between the conscious and unconscious imagination. The unconscious is internally unconsciously perceived (remember the internal perception!). This kind of imagination, for example, dreams, hypnosis, and others affect consciousness overrides setztende means. The conscious imagination, however is a process of conscious thinking. It is not something SandRidge Energy Inc. would like to discuss. The ability to realize as many information as possible combinations of a given commodity is characterized by creativity. Higher creativity sapiens has a homo, the subjective knowledge creation potential is greater. As soon as any information linkages were invented, man must come to the subjective belief (imagination), that the particular combination of information has the capacity to become an idea or even a knowledge.
The degree of conviction varies from person to person. For example, James and Tom have witnessed today a falling Apple. Now they make this experience in their minds after (intern-conscious perception) to gain an insight, why does the Apple on the ground. James has come up with an idea, but then discards it because another approach has won his conviction. James proposed the idea to his buddy Tom. James thinks the Apple fall to the ground because the Earth attracts it. The dude look at him skeptically and now propose his idea to him. Since Tom has a ‘better’ creativity, he has thought up something themselves, what James would never have in life. He claims: the space is so strongly curved from the Earth that the Apple has now no other option than to follow the history of the area. James finds it of course absurd and believes that it may not be easy; This science fiction stuff! His friend, however, is of the opinion that James has a very silly with this subjective conservative setting! Therefore he proposes to him, to walk together in the University and to ask a physics professor. Now they submit their findings Professor by the persuasive communication. The professor has listened to them both and smiles suddenly. His internal perception starts to work. He has not followed their compelling gesture, however subconsciously processed. Instead, he has focused on their sound waves coming out of the mouth. As a professional, he has both information (their subjective findings) in his experience. That’s why 1 of the Association occurs. He now delivered the information called up further to the imagination part and created there through his creativity and consciously learned language phrase; It is his subjective belief. (Because the set contains subjectively-defined knowledge, which has been verified using the empiricism). He expresses the sentence: “Tom is right, because the curvature of the space has been proven experimentally in 1919 by Arthur Eddington.” “I’m sorry James, but your outdated knowledge has been replaced thanks to Albert Einstein.” James has now come to the bitter realization that he adopts disappointing and unconditionally; because he believes the high dominant social regulator (professional > lay). His subjective knowledge was modified with the intersubjective-defined knowledge; a third form of knowledge. Note: This is a part of cognitive-based universal synthesis and is modified with new knowledge.