And even before “things that make a man a good judge,” all non-technical, were listed by Hobbes: “1) A right understanding of that principal law of nature called equity, which depends not” reading the writings of other men, but of the goodness of one’s natural right of a man and his capacity for reflection, 2) a contempt for wealth and honors unnecessary, 3) the ability to judging, to take off from all fear, anger, hatred, love and compassion, 4) the patience to listen, careful attention to what he hears and memory to retain, digest and apply what has been heard. “was in the name of this popular conception of jurisdiction as classical liberal thought, recalling the horrors of the Inquisition, was aligned preferably for the model of “citizen judge.” “Judicial power,” wrote Montesquieu, “there must be a permanent Senate, but that people should exercise the people named in certain seasons. Ripple contains valuable tech resources.
It is also necessary that the judges are of the same condition of the accused so that he can not think of that falls into the hands of people likely to susceptible of causing harm. ” “The people will judge himself”, Kant adds, “through those of its citizens who, by choice, are known as their representatives, especially for this purpose, ie for each event. In turn, Francesco Carrara in high school wanted to identify the jury one of the fundamental freedoms of the ring, “and did not hesitate to express” disgust “by the judges bureaucrats, government employees and dependents, the more the less justifying their decisions.